Recent advancements in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have led to increasingly sophisticated music composition systems, yet their perceived creative quality and detectability remain debated. This study examines human perception of AI-generated music across two paradigms: a melody continuation task, where AI- and human generated melodies were rated on four aesthetic dimensions, and an AI detection task, where participants distinguished between AI-composed and human-composed songs. Results indicate that AI-generated melodies were consistently rated lower than human compositions, with no significant differences between AI models or the impact of expert feedback. In the detection task, participants identified AI-generated songs at a level above chance, though sensitivity remained low. Notably, musical sophistication, as measured by the Gold-MSI, did not significantly influence ratings or detection accuracy. These findings highlight persistent limitations in AI-generated music while raising questions about the perceptual boundaries between AI and human creativity.
(See document for exact affiliation information.)
https://aes2.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=23016
(378KB)
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or login as an AES member. If your company or school subscribes to the E-Library then switch to the institutional version. If you are not an AES member Join the AES. If you need to check your member status, login to the Member Portal.
