Home / Publications / E-library page
Only AES members and Institutional Journal Subscribers can download
Reports that 96 kHz sampled digital audio systems have greater transparency than those sampling at 44.1 kHz apparently conflict with knowledge of the capability of human hearing. The band-limiting filters required are examined for a role in producing these differences. Possible mechanisms are presented for these filters to produce audible artifacts and filter designs avoiding these artifacts are illustrated.
Author (s): Dunn, Julian
Affiliation:
Prism Sound, Cambridge, UK
(See document for exact affiliation information.)
AES Convention: 104
Paper Number:4734
Publication Date:
1998-05-06
Import into BibTeX
Session subject:
Signal Processing
Permalink: https://aes2.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=8446
(775KB)
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or login as an AES member. If your company or school subscribes to the E-Library then switch to the institutional version. If you are not an AES member Join the AES. If you need to check your member status, login to the Member Portal.
Dunn, Julian; 1998; Anti-Alias and Anti-Image Filtering: The Benefits of 96-kHz Sampling Rate Formats for Those Who Cannot Hear Above 20 kHz [PDF]; Prism Sound, Cambridge, UK; Paper 4734; Available from: https://aes2.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=8446
Dunn, Julian; Anti-Alias and Anti-Image Filtering: The Benefits of 96-kHz Sampling Rate Formats for Those Who Cannot Hear Above 20 kHz [PDF]; Prism Sound, Cambridge, UK; Paper 4734; 1998 Available: https://aes2.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=8446