You are currently logged in as an
Institutional Subscriber.
If you would like to logout,
please click on the button below.
Home / Publications / Journal-Online
Only AES members and Institutional Journal Subscribers can download
*Only AES members and Institutional Journal Subscribers can download.
Authors: Ziemer, Tim; Hermann, Thomas; McMullen, Kyla; Höldrich, Robert
Download: PDF (41.38 KB)
Authors: Gross-Vogt, Katharina; Rachdi, Noah; Frank, Matthias
The sonification of handwriting has been shown effective in various learning tasks. In this paper, the authors investigate the sound design used for handwriting interaction based on a simple and cost-efficient prototype. The authentic interaction sound is compared with physically informed sonification designs that employ either natural or inverted mapping. In an experiment, participants copied text and drawings. The authors found simple measures of the structure-borne audio signal that showed how participants were affected in their movements, but only when drawing. In contrast, participants rated the sound features differently only for writing. The authentic interaction sound generally scored best, followed by a natural sonification mapping.
Download: PDF (HIGH Res) (2.74 MB)
Download: PDF (LOW Res) (603.84 KB)
Authors: Kumar, Akash; Puri, Amrita
Download: PDF (HIGH Res) (8.21 MB)
Download: PDF (LOW Res) (1.02 MB)
Authors: Bogan, Krista; Liu, Claire; Nees, Michael A.
Download: PDF (HIGH Res) (1.75 MB)
Download: PDF (LOW Res) (387.17 KB)
Authors: Kalonaris, Stefano
Download: PDF (HIGH Res) (5.73 MB)
Download: PDF (LOW Res) (552.41 KB)
Authors: Pauletto, Sandra; Seznec, Yann
Download: PDF (HIGH Res) (3.37 MB)
Download: PDF (LOW Res) (748.71 KB)
Authors: Garcia Riber, Adrian; Serradilla, Francisco
Download: PDF (HIGH Res) (2.76 MB)
Download: PDF (LOW Res) (525.87 KB)
Authors: Helmuth, Mara
Download: PDF (HIGH Res) (8.02 MB)
Download: PDF (LOW Res) (776.58 KB)
Authors: Ziemer, Tim
Sonification research is intrinsically interdisciplinary. Consequently, a proper documentation of and interdisciplinary discourse about a sonification is often hindered by terminology discrepancies between involved disciplines, i.e., the lack of a common sound terminology in sonification research. Without a common ground, a researcher from one discipline may have trouble understanding the implementation and imagining the resulting sound perception of a sonification, if the sonification is described by a researcher from another discipline. To find a common ground, the author consulted literature on interdisciplinary research and discourse, identified problems that occur in sonification, and applied the recommended solutions. As a result, the author recommends considering three aspects of sonification individually, namely 1) Sound Design Concept, 2) Objective, and 3) Evaluation, clarifying which discipline is involved in which aspect and sticking to this discipline’s terminology. As two requirements of sonifications are that they are a) reproducible and b) interpretable, the author recommends documenting and discussing every sonification design once using audio engineering terminology and once using psychoacoustic terminology. The appendixes provide comprehensive lists of sound terms from both disciplines, together with relevant literature and a clarification of often misunderstood and misused terms.
Download: PDF (HIGH Res) (290.5 KB)
Download: PDF (LOW Res) (206.08 KB)
Institutional Subscribers: If you would like to log into the E-Library using your institutional log in information, please click HERE.