You are currently logged in as an
Institutional Subscriber.
If you would like to logout,
please click on the button below.
Home / Publications / E-library page
Only AES members and Institutional Journal Subscribers can download
Any response, which can be achieved by a vented-box, can also be realized by an equalized closed-box. The resulting excursion functions, however, will be different. The tradeoffs, between these two design concepts, are examined. The problems of closed-box equalizer design, given the spectral content of the signal to be reproduced is studied.
Author (s): Zaustinsky, Eugene
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Department of Mathematics, Stony Brook, NY
(See document for exact affiliation information.)
AES Convention: 81
Paper Number:2415
Publication Date:
1986-11-06
Import into BibTeX
Session subject:
Audio Reproduction, Transducers, and Sound Reinforcement: Modeling
Permalink: https://aes2.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=5015
(837KB)
Click to purchase paper as a non-member or login as an AES member. If your company or school subscribes to the E-Library then switch to the institutional version. If you are not an AES member Join the AES. If you need to check your member status, login to the Member Portal.
Zaustinsky, Eugene; 1986; Are Equalized Closed-Boxes Preferable to Vented-Boxes? [PDF]; State University of New York, Department of Mathematics, Stony Brook, NY; Paper 2415; Available from: https://aes2.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=5015
Zaustinsky, Eugene; Are Equalized Closed-Boxes Preferable to Vented-Boxes? [PDF]; State University of New York, Department of Mathematics, Stony Brook, NY; Paper 2415; 1986 Available: https://aes2.org/publications/elibrary-page/?id=5015